The Individual Oral RURIC.docx

School
Jean Ribault High School*
*We are not endorsed by this school
Course
ENGLISH 158
Pages
3
Upload Date
Feb 10, 2024
Uploaded by BarristerCamelPerson903 on coursehero.com
The Individual Oral Criterion A Knowledge, understanding, and interpretation. What is assessed? Knowledge and understanding of the extracts, and the wider works and texts from which they are taken. The application of this knowledge to the global issue chosen, drawing conclusions with reference to the works and texts. Marks/Scores 0- The response does not meet the standards described by the descriptors below. 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 Good knowledge and understanding of extracts, texts, and works offering an interpretation throughout in the context of the global issue chosen. Evidence is appropriate and supports the development of ideas. 9-10 Excellent knowledge and understanding of extracts, texts, and works offering a compelling interpretation in the context of the global issue chosen. Evidence is appropriate, carefully selected, and supports the development of ideas well. Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation What is assessed? Knowledge of the extracts and the wider works and texts from which they are taken; how this is used to analyze and evaluate how writers' choice of language, structure, and style create a perspective on the global issue chosen. Marks/Scores 0- The response does not meet the standards described by the descriptors below. 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 There is analysis with appropriate and evaluative commentary that is at times perspective. There is good understanding of language, structure, and style in the context of the global issue chosen.
9-10 There is analysis with appropriate and evaluative commentary that is perspective. There is excellent understanding of language, structure, and style in the context of the global issue chosen. Criterion C: Focus and organization What is assessed? Structure, focus and balance. The ability to connect ideas coherently. Marks/Scores 0 The response does not meet the standards described by the descriptors below. 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 The oral is generally clear and sustained. Works and texts are discussed in a balanced way. Ideas develop consistently and coherently. The presentation of ideas is convincing. 9-10 The oral is clear and sustained. There is good balance in how works and texts are discussed. The presentation of ideas is logical and convincing with ideas insightfully connected. Criterion D: Language What is assessed? Clarity, accuracy and effective use of language. Marks/Scores 0 The response does not meet the standards described by the descriptors below. 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 There is clarity and accuracy. There may be small errors, but these do not effect communication. Vocabulary and sentence structure are appropriate and varied. Aspects of style are appropriate and may enhance the oral. 9-10 There is clarity, accuracy and variation. There may be small errors, but these do not affect communication. Vocabulary and sentence structure are
appropriate, varied, and enhance the presentation of ideas. Aspects of style are appropriate and enhance the oral.
Page1of 3
Uploaded by BarristerCamelPerson903 on coursehero.com